LnRiLWZpZWxke21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MC43NmVtfS50Yi1maWVsZC0tbGVmdHt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmxlZnR9LnRiLWZpZWxkLS1jZW50ZXJ7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpjZW50ZXJ9LnRiLWZpZWxkLS1yaWdodHt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnJpZ2h0fS50Yi1maWVsZF9fc2t5cGVfcHJldmlld3twYWRkaW5nOjEwcHggMjBweDtib3JkZXItcmFkaXVzOjNweDtjb2xvcjojZmZmO2JhY2tncm91bmQ6IzAwYWZlZTtkaXNwbGF5OmlubGluZS1ibG9ja311bC5nbGlkZV9fc2xpZGVze21hcmdpbjowfQ==
LnRiLWhlYWRpbmcuaGFzLWJhY2tncm91bmR7cGFkZGluZzowfQ==
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
Segnaliamo che con sentenza 7 settembre 2010, n. 5122, il TAR Lombardia ha rimesso alla Corte Costituzionale la questione di legittimità costituzionale del combinato disposto dell’art. 27, comma 1, lett. d) della L.R. n. 12/2009 e dell’art. 22 della L.R. n. 7/2010, ai sensi del quale in Lombardia la ristrutturazione edilizia tramite demolizione e ricostruzione può avvenire “senza vincolo di sagoma”. Scarica file.
